Benevolent Dictator: Wonderful Counselor

God has built authority into his creation. It originates with him, and is mediated through others. The Bible, and history, record the often ruinous ways in which God’s authority has been wielded by those who have had the privilege to possess it. Ahaz, the king of Judah at the time when several familiar prophecies were given, is an egregious example. In an attempt to preserve his power, rather than trusting Yahweh he sought to make an alliance with a pagan ruler, sending him the gold and silver stored in the Temple. Additionally, he sacrificed his son to a pagan god in an attempt to curry its favor. He then shut up the temple and set up alternative altars in Jerusalem. And most foolishly, he discounted the signs and ignored the stern, yet gracious, warnings from the God who had placed him on the eternal throne of David. Ahaz was a monumental political disaster. 

Yet, in the midst of this debacle, Yahweh offered a vision of political power that would be wielded with perfection. “Unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon his shoulder . . .” Here is one who will rule with all authority and will do so with wisdom, justice, and righteousness, for he will be the “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” (Isaiah 9:6,7) What an extraordinary hope to set before us!

We can be grateful that in our country we have not had to suffer the sorrow and heartache of a despotic ruler, such as Ahaz. The framers of the Constitution were wise enough to understand that tyranny results when a person, or particular faction, is allowed to have absolute authority. The separation of powers effected by establishing three branches of government has proven to be a hedge against such an accretion of power. But it is a sad commentary on the untrustworthiness of fallen man that a such form of government was thought necessary. As Lord Acton famously observed, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

Advent is the season when the church looks backward and forward, simultaneously. We look back to the fulfillment of the promise of a coming deliverer, and forward to the fulness of his deliverance. And that fulness entails his assuming the role of benevolent dictator. During his brief earthly sojourn, Jesus inaugurated his rule, but he promises that one day he will return to establish the envisioned peaceable kingdom. We pray with faith and live in hope of his return. May God hasten the day. 

Advent: The Politics of Christmas 1

When a Christian confesses “Jesus is Lord” he or she is making more than a personal statement of faith. The title “Lord” is fraught with political significance, as is evident in the vision of the victorious Christ that includes his wearing a robe on which “he has a name written, King of kings and Lord of lords” (Revelation 19 ). He is the one to whom “all authority in heaven and earth” was given and he wields it as Sovereign over all. There is no higher authority on this earth than the one whom we confess as Lord.

This is important for us to remember in the wake of the recent election. Too often we heard Christians speak fearfully of a loss of our religious liberties. Such liberties are a cherished benefit granted by the Constitution of this country, and the country would be wise to protect them. But Christians should not be acting out of fear when they cast their vote. While the Constitution may promise religious freedom, Jesus did not. Nevertheless, we are to hold fast to our allegiance to him for he is building his church, against which the gates of hell will not prevail.

One of the most familiar prophecies concerning the coming of Christ is from Isaiah 7:14, “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.” This was fulfilled historically in the conception and birth of Jesus. Significant to note is that this sign was first given to Ahaz, a king of Judah, who, out of fear, struck a deal with a pagan nation in an attempt to defend himself from an attack by an alliance that was threatening his kingdom. The sign was given by God to assure Ahaz that he had nothing to fear, He would take care of his foes. Alas, the king trusted the pagans more than Yahweh and paid the price for it.

The birth of Jesus is as much of a sign to us as it was to Ahaz, if not more so. It teaches us that the church needs to be mindful about whom we make political alliances with. We need to be governed by faith, not fear, for the one who we confess as Lord is the same one about whom it was prophesied “the government shall be upon his shoulder [and] . . . of the increase of his government and of peace there will be no end . . .” (Isaiah 9:6-7). Jesus IS Lord.

The Immoral Ones

Last weekend marked the Fourth of July, the date of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Some 12 years later the Constitution of the United States was ratified. Two years after that the Bill of Rights, containing the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was also ratified. These are the seminal documents of our country and the ones looked to when laws are tested and rights are claimed by the citizens of this country. 

From its inception, Christianity has enjoyed a place of privilege in the United States. When the First Amendment speaks of “freedom of religion” it certainly had in mind the Christian religion in its various expressions. That right has been rightly extended to other religions, but Christianity has been the prominent religion in the history of this country. 

This place of privilege has allowed Christians to assume that our beliefs are not to be challenged. Any assault upon them are a provocation to press our rights. This is all well and good as long as the Constitution is interpreted in a manner that allows us the “free exercise” of our religion. But of late, interpretation has not been going in a way that supports biblical morals and, as a consequence, Christianity is no longer viewed positively. The belief system that historically undergirded the morality of our nation is now, for all intents and purposes, declared immoral, and the church is struggling to accept the new state of affairs.

But the apostle Peter says that we should not be surprised when a “fiery trial” comes upon us, and people “insult” us because we claim allegiance to Jesus and biblical teachings. Such is to be expected. He gives three reasons for it. First, it serves to test our faith, which when found to be genuine and lasting will be to the glory of God and the church (1:7; 4:12-13). Second, it comes with the territory of being brought under the sway of mores different than those that used to guide us. This pits us against the world and they do not like it. As a result, we have the joy of sharing in the sufferings of the one who was condemned by the world he came to save (4:1-5, 12-16). Third, God’s intention is to present to his son a holy bride so he turns up the heat to produce righteousness in her. This intentional purifying has been his practice among his people throughout his dealings with them (4:17; Malachi 3:1-3).

As we watch our neighbors increasingly embrace a morality that directly challenges God’s word, we should expect that all manner of insults and maligning will be forth coming. But if we “suffer according to God's will” we are to “entrust [our] souls to a faithful Creator while doing good.” His laws and judgment will prove eternally more reliable that any Constitution or panel of judges.