Cretans Being Cretans, Not Christians

Paul presents a stark contrast between those who are fit to lead a church and those who are not. His instructions to Titus make it clear that Titus should be looking for men that have been sufficiently shaped by the Holy Spirit and the Word of God that they will be able to nurture the flock and defend the faith. The need was immediate for there were some moving among the churches who were still acting like Cretans, not Christians, and offering teaching that was gainful, not biblical. The result was that “whole families” were being troubled. Paul directs Titus to sharply rebuke these men that “they may be sound in the faith.” The circumstances on Crete demanded this strong response from the apostle. If the unbiblical cultural commitments in which these new converts had been nurtured continued to hold sway in their lives, they, and the church, would not prosper. Biblical authority and truth needed to be established (see Titus 1).

The challenge that the early church faced on Crete is the same challenge that the church has faced in every generation and location. How can people have their minds renewed and their lives ordered so that they think and act like human beings are created to think and act? As Paul’s counsel suggests, they must learn “sound doctrine” based upon the “trustworthy word” and allow it to become the definitive voice in their lives. 

Now, I doubt if many of the people reading this reject in principle the need for sound doctrine based upon the trustworthy word to be authoritative in the church. In practice, however, it can be a hard won battle. This is particularly so when the teachings of Scripture run contrary to the prevailing culture.  Believers are then forced to choose and if they are not yet sufficiently trusting of Scripture’s authority, the prevailing culture wins out. That appears to be what happened to those on Crete who were teaching “for shameful gain.” They were just doing what Cretans were known for, what everyone else thought was perfectly acceptable.

There’s a standing warning in this letter. It tells us to reexamine our thinking when what we allow as perfectly acceptable runs contrary to Scripture, no matter how much it is being embraced in the prevailing culture. Each generation will have its own challenges in this regard, but submitting to the truth of God is the wisest, the only, choice.

Grace for Then - Grace for Now

Some time back, a controversy arose in the evangelical church over what is called “lordship salvation.” In its simplest terms, the question is whether one can have Christ as Savior but not as Lord. That is, can one possess salvation for eternal life while exhibiting no discipleship in this life? The “lordship salvation” people say that if one has been redeemed by the grace of God, one should also expect that one will be renewed by the grace of God. Those who oppose, say that to measure whether or not people are saved by judging their progress in holiness is a form of legalism — if grace is free apart from works then we should not be judging that grace by works. Lordship people counter by saying that, indeed, grace is free, not a result of works, but the grace imparted for salvation is also imparted for sanctification, they cannot be separated.

I’m with the “lordship salvation” camp. What I find comforting in this doctrine is that the holiness expected of disciples throughout the New Testament does not rest in my will or determination to realize. It is grace that is “training [believers] to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age” (Titus 2:12). As John MacArthur observes, “It is unthinkable that God would sacrifice His Son to purchase heaven for sinners but leave them to fend for themselves against the power of sin in this life.” Grace is available, is at work, to make us into the kind of people Jesus came to save, “a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works” (Titus 2:14).

Does that mean that there is nothing for us to do regarding sanctification? Do we just persist in feeding on sin until grace comes along, grabs us by the scruff of the neck to drag us away from the trough? I don’t think that’s what Paul (nor the “lordship” camp) has in mind. Consider the description of the activity of grace in the letter: training. This is the Greek term used to describe the instruction of children. The purpose of training is to direct children to what is good and healthy for them. The hoped for result is that they will learn for themselves, evidenced by their following the wisdom they have embraced, what is profitable and what is not. It’s no different for us. Grace is at work awakening us to what is true, good, and beautiful so that we would “live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age.” Grace saves; grace trains. Grace for then; grace for now. Soli deo gloria.

Advent: The Politics of Christmas 4

The English word advent comes from a Latin word meaning arrival. It’s an appropriate term, therefore, with which to label the time of year in which we await the arrival of Jesus, the Savior. Usually, the focus of this season is on his entering this world as a baby born of a virgin. Historically, however, the church has also included his returning to “judge the living and the dead,” as the creed states. This second and final arrival will realize the fullness of the salvation he came to effect.

Our focus over the past few weeks has been the political nature of Advent and Christmas. We’ve considered how prophecy foresees his righteous rule; how the language surrounding his birth alludes to his assuming the throne of David; and the way in which his birth anticipates his being crucified for being the “king of the Jews.” But when we contemplate his second coming we find it to be the most political of all, for as the opening of Revelation declares, he “is coming with the clouds.” Such a coming signals the political nature of his arrival for it references another piece of apocalyptic literature. In Daniel 7 we are given a glimpse into the heavenly courtroom where ruthless kings are being judged and condemned by the Ancient of Days. Subsequent to that judgment, Daniel reports, “I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before him. And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed” (7:13-14). The vision is potent! The deposed kings are likened to ferocious beasts, yet the one coming with the clouds assumes a breadth of rule that these wannabes wish they could possess.

Apocalyptic literature is just what Christians need to read in our current climate, a climate confidently described as “post-Christian.” Christianity’s influence has undeniably waned and followers of Jesus are the object of scorn. Such marginalization can have a corrosive effect on the church’s faith. We either lose heart, or we yield to the seeming greater power. In his mercy, God has seen fit to raise up a kind of literature that gives us a glimpse of "the bigger picture." And this genre teaches us that we should not fear the powerful for the God who rescued us from hell will cause us to triumph over all the forces that war against the Lord and his Anointed. In the end our faith will be vindicated and rewarded. 

So take heart. Grace and peace from the triune God is ours!

Advent: The Politics of Christmas 3

When Joseph decided that he should not proceed with his marriage to Mary, an angel appeared to let him know what was actually going on with his betrothed. She had not been unfaithful. Rather, she had been chosen to bear the promised redeemer. The angel instructed him that the child should be named Jesus, “for he will save his people from their sins.” Joseph yielded.

To save from sin Jesus had to make atonement, not for himself but for the sinners he came to rescue. This necessitated his dying. But how he died was important. The chosen means was crucifixion, a horrifyingly gruesome form of execution. This method accomplished several things. First, it was the result of a judicial sentence. He was tried and found guilty. This established him as a law breaker. Second, he received a curse under the Mosaic law, which declares anyone who dies upon a tree as a result of a judgment was cursed (Deuteronomy 21:22-23). And third, it was a death reserved for the despised and forgotten of society. 

In every aspect of this humiliating death he was undeserving. It was all for our gain. We are the ones who stand guilty before God’s judgment seat. We are the ones deserving of the law’s curse. We are the ones who having exalted ourselves before the face of God deserve to be cast away, remembered no more. Instead of us, however, it was Jesus, who, despite his divine status, “stripped himself of all privilege by consenting to be a slave by nature and being born as mortal man. And, having become man, he humbled himself by living a life of utter obedience, even to the extent of dying, and the death he died was the death of a common criminal” (Philippians 2:6-8, J.B. Phillips translation).

This ignominious death is what awaited the child born in Bethlehem. He was marked from the very beginning, indeed, before the foundation of the world, to die a rebel’s death. In doing so, however, he turns fallen reality upside-down. The strong are shown to be impotent, the proud are brought low, the forgotten are remembered. True humanity is reinserted into creation and peace with God and peace with man is possible! 

“My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior.”

Advent: The Politics of Christmas 2

Jesus was a revolutionary. Not the gun toting or fist raising type, but a revolutionary nonetheless. His arrival on the scene signaled to all would-be rulers that arrogant, self-serving, self-glorifying, power-grabbing, God-denying exercise of government will be overturned. This is evident in the language of the Magnificat, Mary’s famous hymn of grateful praise.

The use of the past tense in her hymn indicates the confidence she has that, though the child is still growing within her, the end for which he has come is as good as done:

“He has shown strength with his arm;

he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts;

he has brought down the mighty from their thrones

and exalted those of humble estate;

he has filled the hungry with good things,

and the rich he has sent away empty.” (Luke 1:51-53)

The theme of “reversal” in the hymn (mighty brought down, those of humble estate, exalted; rich sent away empty, the hungry filled), as well as in the rest of the Gospel of Luke, is a hard lesson for human beings to learn. I think this is particularly so for we Americans. Virtually all aspects of our society (including the people in it) are valued by how “successful” they prove to be. And the metrics used always favor the wealthiest, strongest, fastest, and prettiest. This creeps into the thinking of the church as well. I recall when the young baseball phenom, Darryl Strawberry, made a profession of faith. Before you knew it, he was on the speakers’ platform of evangelical rallies as proof that you can be an incredibly talented athlete and a Christian at the same time. This did not serve Darryl, and it did not serve the cause of Christ. What he needed was careful discipleship, not being made the poster child for “successful” Christianity. 

This linking of the success of the Kingdom to the successful is filled with peril. The danger is that we forget who it is we are following. Jesus warned (off?) one potential adherent, “Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head” (Luke 9:58). To another he challenged, “Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me” (Luke 18:22). Neither scenario fits the American model of success. But for those to whom he was speaking, their true success depended upon their joining the “last shall be first and the first shall be last” revolution (Luke 13:30). 

Advent: The Politics of Christmas 1

When a Christian confesses “Jesus is Lord” he or she is making more than a personal statement of faith. The title “Lord” is fraught with political significance, as is evident in the vision of the victorious Christ that includes his wearing a robe on which “he has a name written, King of kings and Lord of lords” (Revelation 19 ). He is the one to whom “all authority in heaven and earth” was given and he wields it as Sovereign over all. There is no higher authority on this earth than the one whom we confess as Lord.

This is important for us to remember in the wake of the recent election. Too often we heard Christians speak fearfully of a loss of our religious liberties. Such liberties are a cherished benefit granted by the Constitution of this country, and the country would be wise to protect them. But Christians should not be acting out of fear when they cast their vote. While the Constitution may promise religious freedom, Jesus did not. Nevertheless, we are to hold fast to our allegiance to him for he is building his church, against which the gates of hell will not prevail.

One of the most familiar prophecies concerning the coming of Christ is from Isaiah 7:14, “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.” This was fulfilled historically in the conception and birth of Jesus. Significant to note is that this sign was first given to Ahaz, a king of Judah, who, out of fear, struck a deal with a pagan nation in an attempt to defend himself from an attack by an alliance that was threatening his kingdom. The sign was given by God to assure Ahaz that he had nothing to fear, He would take care of his foes. Alas, the king trusted the pagans more than Yahweh and paid the price for it.

The birth of Jesus is as much of a sign to us as it was to Ahaz, if not more so. It teaches us that the church needs to be mindful about whom we make political alliances with. We need to be governed by faith, not fear, for the one who we confess as Lord is the same one about whom it was prophesied “the government shall be upon his shoulder [and] . . . of the increase of his government and of peace there will be no end . . .” (Isaiah 9:6-7). Jesus IS Lord.

A Wise Master Builder

In the opening greeting of Paul’s letter to Titus, as a wise master builder he implicitly lays the foundation for the central issues he addresses in this short letter: authority and truth. By describing himself as “a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ,” and stating that his preaching ministry is a task “entrusted” to him “by the command of God our Savior,” he establishes the authority by which he will insist that his “child in a common faith” act with dispatch to put “what remained into order” on the island of Crete. Additionally, when he says that his calling is for “the sake of the faith of God's elect and their knowledge of the truth” he asserts the standard by which false teachers will judged and the people of God will be protected.

Authority and truth are two inescapable realities that are hard for human beings to accept. We have challenged them from the beginning and, as a result, have been forever plagued by the fallout (see Genesis 3). That this is true for all humanity is evident from an even cursory look at history. That the church has also fallen prey is evident from the fact that falsehood always finds a hearing, creating havoc. Why should this be except that even those within the church are hesitant to accept God’s full and final authority in our lives? John Stott asks, “In the final analysis this is the big question for the church: is there such a thing as divine revelation? Do we concede that truth, having been revealed by God, ipso facto has authority over us? Are we ready to submit to it, that is, to him, in humble faith and obedience? Or are we brash enough to behave like unruly children and reject God’s authority?”

Jesus warned that “false christs and false prophets will arise and perform signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, the elect” (Mark 13:22). We can appreciate, then, the wisdom of Paul to minister as boldly as he does for “the sake of the faith of the elect and their knowledge of the truth.” He knows that without embracing the twin realities of divine authority and truth the people of God leave themselves open to deception and to suffer the attendant consequences.

15 Years Hence

In the immediate aftermath of 9/11 I observed things I never thought I would see in my bohemian, politically left-leaning, decidedly humanist neighborhood — spontaneous altars. At lampposts and street corners, candles and bouquets of flowers would be laid. They appeared like votive offerings “to the unknown God” of Athens fame. It signaled to me that my neighbors wanted to believe that there was something, someone, that sat outside of the realities of the tragedy that could bring sense, comfort, even peace in the face of the assault. This impulse was echoed across the city in the numerous “interfaith” services that were organized. Did the attack make people realize that they needed something other than themselves to believe in? Perhaps, but only for a while. 

New York is a remarkable place. Its mettle has been proved in not being undone by having a target painted on its chest (a target that every New Yorker knows remains in place). The city has long gone back to its famous hustle and bustle. This place is an astonishing and persuasive example of God’s common grace. But common grace is not saving grace. Those relative few moments of self-awareness (if that’s what it can be called) did not spark an awakening. 

There are signs, however, that fallen humanity, no matter how determined, will not have the last word. The church responded well post 9/11, serving sacrificially with time and materials, and in the years that have followed, the church has continued to respond as God has drawn an unprecedented number of young men to move themselves and their families to New York to plant churches. Perhaps our God who shines light into darkness and overcomes evil with good used the attack to bring our great city onto the radar screen of these Gospel entrepreneurs. In the end we might just discover that what the islamists meant for evil God meant for good. I think it possible. 

The Immoral Ones

Last weekend marked the Fourth of July, the date of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Some 12 years later the Constitution of the United States was ratified. Two years after that the Bill of Rights, containing the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was also ratified. These are the seminal documents of our country and the ones looked to when laws are tested and rights are claimed by the citizens of this country. 

From its inception, Christianity has enjoyed a place of privilege in the United States. When the First Amendment speaks of “freedom of religion” it certainly had in mind the Christian religion in its various expressions. That right has been rightly extended to other religions, but Christianity has been the prominent religion in the history of this country. 

This place of privilege has allowed Christians to assume that our beliefs are not to be challenged. Any assault upon them are a provocation to press our rights. This is all well and good as long as the Constitution is interpreted in a manner that allows us the “free exercise” of our religion. But of late, interpretation has not been going in a way that supports biblical morals and, as a consequence, Christianity is no longer viewed positively. The belief system that historically undergirded the morality of our nation is now, for all intents and purposes, declared immoral, and the church is struggling to accept the new state of affairs.

But the apostle Peter says that we should not be surprised when a “fiery trial” comes upon us, and people “insult” us because we claim allegiance to Jesus and biblical teachings. Such is to be expected. He gives three reasons for it. First, it serves to test our faith, which when found to be genuine and lasting will be to the glory of God and the church (1:7; 4:12-13). Second, it comes with the territory of being brought under the sway of mores different than those that used to guide us. This pits us against the world and they do not like it. As a result, we have the joy of sharing in the sufferings of the one who was condemned by the world he came to save (4:1-5, 12-16). Third, God’s intention is to present to his son a holy bride so he turns up the heat to produce righteousness in her. This intentional purifying has been his practice among his people throughout his dealings with them (4:17; Malachi 3:1-3).

As we watch our neighbors increasingly embrace a morality that directly challenges God’s word, we should expect that all manner of insults and maligning will be forth coming. But if we “suffer according to God's will” we are to “entrust [our] souls to a faithful Creator while doing good.” His laws and judgment will prove eternally more reliable that any Constitution or panel of judges.

Fulfilling Our Assignment

The response of the woman who was “forgiven much” (Luke 7:36-50) is humbling. Her outpouring of gratitude upon Jesus places before us unabashed, unfiltered adoration -- and it is humbling. Have you ever been as free in expressing your loving service to the Savior (read the account again, just to be sure)? I don’t know that I have. But if I’m honest, I have just as much cause for untempered worship as she. This is why I need to heed the call to be “transformed by the renewal of [my] mind” (Romans 12:1-2). I need to not think of myself more highly than I ought to think, for Jesus came to save sinners, those who need to be forgiven much and those who need to be forgiven not as much (I’ll let you decide which category I fall into).

This relationship is important to establish before Paul goes on to speak of God’s intention to use every member of the church in his service. The exercise of the gifts he gives should be undertaken with gratitude and faith. And if we are clear about our lack of standing before God and the eternal peril we faced apart from his grace, whole-life service of him should not be hard to muster. 

After we’ve contemplated deeply the sacrifice that was offered on our behalf and had our hearts stirred to respond with grateful service, the next step is to utilize the gifts he assigns within the context of the local church. Though this is obvious from all that the New Testament has to say about ministering in the name of Jesus, it is too often missed by Christians. One only needs to look at the brief list in Romans 12:3-8 to understand how God intends for us to serve him by serving one another, with one another. As someone had said, “one Christian is no Christian.” Each of us is only a part of the whole and we need one another to be all that God has designed for us to be. 

Together we must prayerfully proceed in fulfilling our assignments. As we do this worshipfully and lovingly we might just “discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.” That is, God will show us how we can best serve his purposes in this place, at this time. 

The Gospel Imperative

The parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus (Luke 16) is arguably one of the three best known parables, a trio which includes the Prodigal Son and the Good Samaritan. I suspect that is so because all three possess vivid imagery. What sets the Rich Man and Lazarus apart, however, is the graphic portrayal of the destiny of human beings who die having lived lives that are not “rich toward God.” The quote, you may know, is from the parable of the Rich Fool (Luke 12). That parable warns against covetousness, illustrating that in the end what we possess on earth will be left behind and we will stand before God to account for what we did with what he brought under our stewardship. We should not, therefore, covet another’s riches, which only breeds discontent, but should seek, rather, the contentment that comes from trusting and serving our wise and gracious heavenly Father. In that way, we will be “rich toward God.”

Once again, the call to stewardship is presented in the Rich Man and Lazarus. But this time the sentence that awaits is depicted. In a stunning reversal, the one people would have assumed was blessed by God, evidenced by his great wealth, is condemned, while the one assumed to be condemned, evidenced by his extreme destitution, is blessed. And the condemnation is terrifying: a state of unrelenting and unalterable torment that is physical, psychological, and eternal. Such is the warning Jesus gives those who are “lovers of money,” who “seek to justify [themselves] before men,” who are seemingly unaware that “what is exalted among men is an abomination in the sight of God” (Luke 16:14-15).

Despite the harrowing outcome for such ones, we are to be reminded that the one who paints the picture is hailed as Savior. He came to save greedy, self-justifying, hard-hearted humans. This is the good news, the gospel, that has been proclaimed by the church since it was commissioned by her Lord to make disciples of the nations. Faith in his faithfulness is what guarantees the depicted balm for the impoverished soul, be that one rich in this world’s goods or poor. And as long as that one breathes there is hope that the good news will be heard. This is why we must persistently pray to God for the grace, wisdom, and courage to tell others of the Savior, for “faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Romans 10:17).

Godliness with Contentment

It has been said that the first and last commandments of the Decalogue complement each other. The first declares that we are to have no other God than the God who delivered us from bondage. The tenth says that we shall not covet. How are these prohibitions complementary? The first intimates that we are to trust that the God who rescued us will not forsake us. He alone is the one to whom we must turn for all that we need. Faith in him and him alone is fundamental to our relationship with him. To covet, on the other hand, is to be discontent with what God has provided. When we desire the things of our neighbor to the point of complaining about our lack, we profess that our God is not as kind or as generous as theirs. Such adoration for a another god is nothing less than idolatry.

Jesus uses the parable of the rich fool to say as much (Luke 12:13-21). With it he warns against wealth’s power to captivate and deceive us into thinking that we are in control of everything around us, even our future. Whether we possess the riches, or just wish that we did, we are instructed that our first priority should be pursuing wealth toward God. Our hope, our confidence, our contentment should derive from our knowledge of him and his salvation, and not from an imaginary existence that we believe will satisfy. To rest in wealth, real or imagined, is to place our hopes in the hands of an idol.

Confidence in the true God, in his promises, wisdom, power, and love, breeds contentment. Coveting that which is our neighbor's, whether it be his home, wife, job, or status, breeds discontentment. The former is the fruit of the gospel working in our life. The latter, the fruit of giving rein to unsanctified yearning. 

With the Spirit’s help we can experience contentment. He can develop in us a godly response to earthly riches (material or otherwise) so that we can pursue and enjoy them free of the striving that marks a covetous soul. The key is understanding that we are stewards of all that God allows us to possess. To be rich toward God is to use the riches he bestows to his glory. This was the wealthy man’s folly. God had given him much but he decided it was for him to use as he pleased — he would “relax, eat, drink, and be merry.” There will be scant mirth for such a one when called to give an account. Truly, “better is a little with the fear of the LORD than great treasure and trouble with it” (Proverbs 15:16).

The Resurrection: Validation and Vindication of the Lamb of God

The resurrection of Jesus, the assertion central to the observance of Easter, is a non-negotiable component of the Gospel. Paul states this clearly: “I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures” (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). Why are these particular teachings “of first importance”? They are the ground upon which we claim the hope of eternal life. 

Jesus died to atone for our sins. As the sacrificial and substitutionary Lamb of God, he fulfilled all righteousness even to the point of dying on a cross. Then, in fulfillment of what was said about the coming Savior, he died among the wicked and was buried with the rich. But most important of all that is of “first importance,” he rose again from the dead. This is critical. For as Paul bluntly states, “if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.” Why is this so? Because it is the resurrection that validates and vindicates Jesus.

He told his disciples beforehand, on several occasions, that he would be given over to be scourged and crucified but would come back to life “on the third day.” That this indeed happened validates the words he spoke about his death and resurrection and by extension all that he taught and said. The resurrection also vindicated Jesus against all the charges that were leveled against him. He was not a demon-possessed, blaspheming criminal deserving of death. To the contrary, he “was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead” (Romans 1:4). In the words of Peter, “God raised him up, loosing the pangs of death, because it was not possible for him to be held by it” (Acts 2:24).

If Jesus did not rise from the dead then he could not have been the “Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). He would have been just another human being who needed the Lamb of as much as anyone else. But with his resurrection his person and purpose were proclaimed. Faith in him is not futile. It is that which saves the sinner for “there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).

Heaven on Earth?

Have your read Psalm 72? If you haven't, please do. If you have, read it again. It's a prayer that God would give the king (the royal son) righteousness and justice so that he might rule righteously and justly. As the prayer unfolds, the existence under his righteous and just reign is longingly expressed: the oppressor is crushed, the poor and needy are defended, and even the land produces in abundance under his stewardship. His rule would be "like rain that falls on the mown grass, like showers that water the earth." All authority would be yielded to him as "all kings fall down before him, all nations serve him." And why? For "he delivers the needy when he calls, / the poor and him who has no helper. / He has pity on the weak and the needy, / and saves the lives of the needy. / From oppression and violence he redeems their life, / and precious is their blood in his sight."

The psalm is attributed to Solomon, David's son. He clearly had a vision for what it would mean to have a righteous ruler on the throne. Unfortunately, it was not realized in is reign. In truth, his idolatry led him far away from this ideal and after his death it was acknowledged that his vanity had put a "heavy yoke" upon those he ruled. Solomon's successor was counseled to "be a servant to this people today and serve them, and speak good words to them when you answer them, then they will be your servants forever" (1 Kings 12:7). That advice was a fitting summary of the psalm that Solomon had penned. Alas, Solomon did not follow it. Nor did his successor, Rehoboam.

I think it safe to say that no ruler has ever fulfilled this vision. Whether monarch, dictator, president, or prime minister, no one has ever succeeded in engineering heaven on earth, no matter how noble his or her intentions. There is only one king that has ever graced the Earth who is capable of achieving this longed-for existence. He is the one who confronts us on Palm Sunday. He it is who ushers in the Kingdom of Heaven with his humble entrance into Jerusalem. 

But it must be noted that the full realization of a perfect human existence under the rule of our benevolent King awaits the consummation of the age. Only when the new heaven and earth are manifested will we completely experience the promised peaceable kingdom. Till then, we await him and pray with the faithful, "Even so, come, Lord Jesus!" (Revelation 22:20).

Full Disclosure

Perhaps you know the famous quote from President John F. Kennedy's inaugural speech, "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." The brilliance of the line is how it succinctly expresses the obligations of citizenship. It is a call to service, to sacrifice, on behalf of your country and its aims.

The intent of the phrase could well be adapted to the task of preaching the gospel. Too often the gospel is presented as a pretty gift, wrapped in bright paper and topped with a bow, that's handed to the listener in a manner that communicates, "Ask anything you want from God and he'll give it to you -- no strings attached!" Unfortunately, this does not accurately represent the enterprise given the church by its Savior. It's true that the price necessary for a sinner's redemption has been fully paid by the obedience of Christ. By faith and faith alone are the benefits of that meritorious work put upon the sinner's account. He need not add anything. That amazing grace needs to be preached and preached boldly. But Jesus says there is more to the gospel call. The other side of the coin is the call to discipleship. And this is where the enterprise gets challenging. It involves not just what God has done for you, but what he calls you to do for him.

Jesus taught that if one is not willing to be more loyal to him than to anyone or any thing else, even one's own life, then that one cannot be his disciple. And if one is not willing to bear the suffering and rejection contained in the cross, a cross that awaits each follower of Jesus, then that one cannot be his disciple. His suffering has, indeed, freely bought the sinner salvation, but faith in him will not be free from suffering, for faith in Jesus sets the believer against the world. It is inevitable, therefore, that at some point in the life of a follower of Jesus his or her loyalty to Christ will be tested, and when that happens whether or not that one is a disciple will be revealed. This is why Jesus asks those who would follow him to count the cost.

We want to be faithful to call people to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ, but for the sake of full disclosure, we must also tell them all that that call entails. If they choose to follow Jesus they do so at the risk of losing everything they hold dear. It will not be a popular message but it's the one we are expected to give. After all, we've been commissioned to make disciples of all nations and a would-be disciple must count the cost.

The Parable of the Two Prodigals

As we represent our Savior and his gospel in the world, our hearts must be in the right place. A healthy view of our own need of grace leads us to be humble and grateful for his mercy, eager to see others embrace the good news, and to rejoice with the angels in heaven when sinners come to Christ in repentance and faith. But if we presume a place of privilege, or view the blessings of salvation as entitlements, then we have lost sight of the grace extended to us and are quick to judge others as unworthy. Jesus knew the Pharisees were blinded by just this kind of unloving self-righteousness and offered a set of three parables to expose the hardness of their hearts (Luke 15:1-32).

The parables have a number of things in common: each includes something that is lost, each reveals that the lost item has great value for the one seeking it, each includes a celebration in response to the lost item being recovered. But it’s the last of the parables, the one known as the Parable of the Prodigal Son, that most directly addresses the Pharisees’ ungraciousness. In the story, the “older brother” is the placeholder for the Pharisees. His refusal to celebrate at the return of his wastrel younger brother parallels the Pharisees lack of appreciation for what was transpiring in the ministry of Jesus. He received and ate with “tax collectors and sinners” because that is what you do when something precious that was lost is found. Like the repentant younger brother, they were being restored to the family, and Jesus rejoiced.

Let me suggest that the younger brother was not the only prodigal in the family. He may have gone off and wasted his inheritance, but the older brother wasted the opportunity afforded him by staying home and close to his father. Though he spent each day with him, he was not shaped by him. Wasn’t this the Pharisees’ problem? They were diligent to study and obey the law and prophets and yet did not know the God revealed in them. If they had, they too would be celebrating. As it was, their reluctance only demonstrated their scrupulosity was nothing but grudging obedience.

We don’t want to follow the example of either of the prodigals in this parable (unless it is to repent like the younger of the two). To hedonistically squander our possessions is to be a poor steward of God's grace. But neither do we want to squander the access afforded us to the throne of grace by not being formed more and more into the image of the One through whom grace has come. Our union with Christ can give us eyes to see the mercy of God on display when even the most debauched of people humble themselves before the living God. That is not something to protest, but to celebrate.

Build a Wall?

What's the "takeaway" of the parable of the Good Samaritan? It's the call to compassion. This is the motivation that Jesus attributes to his character's actions. As the author of the parable, he chose his words carefully. 

The telling of the story grew out of a discussion concerning what's often called "the summation of the law": "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself" (Luke 10:27). The man engaged with him, one who was skilled in rabbinic law, sought to limit his obligation by asking, "And who is my neighbor?" Jesus' masterstroke was to offer a story that put the focus back on the commandment, which says to love the neighbor "as yourself." Jesus wanted his inquisitor to put himself in the situation of the man who had been beaten and left half-dead. What would he want from someone who happened upon him, the actions of the priest and Levite who avoided the problem? Would it not be for a fellow human being (the inclusion of a Samaritan as hero was particularly loaded) to have mercy on him and help him? Would it not be compassion? If that's what you would want, Jesus infers, then "go and do likewise."

This is an important lesson for us, particularly now. Some self-described evangelicals are aligning themselves with politicians who promise them security and prosperity by staying on the other side of the road, the side that keeps them from having to embrace the messy process of compassion. But what if it was they who had to flee the devastation of war? What if was they who left a homeland of intractable economic woes, political unrest, and vicious gang violence? What if it was they who were seeking to create a safer, prosperous future for themselves and their families? It's challenging to see ourselves in the other, but isn't that what Jesus is asking of us -- to do for them what we would have done for us? (cf., Luke 6:31)

Do I sound like a "liberal"? Do I sound like a woosy? I hope I sound like Jesus. 

The issue of illegal immigration (to name just one of a myriad of issues) is complicated. But we must not lose sight of the fact that we are Christians first, Americans second. As citizens of the heavenly kingdom, compassion, the etymology of which is "suffer with," trumps nationalism. We must embrace the governing ethic of our King, "Be merciful, even as your Father is merciful" (Luke 6:37).

Not a Sacrifice

If there was a fire in your apartment building forcing you to leave quickly, what would you grab on the way out? What would you want to save? If you have children . . . I suppose that goes without saying. Or a pet, likewise, I assume you’d be sure to take the dog or cat. But what else? Passport? Photos? Computer? A painting? What if you could only take one or two things? What would you choose? Whatever you ended up choosing would say something about what you think is most valuable (and not necessarily monetarily) among all of your possessions.

For the men in two of Jesus’ parables, one who discovered an unprecedented pearl, the other a buried treasure, the realization of what was most valuable didn’t come at the expense of a tragedy. Just the opposite was true. Theirs was a discovery that brought joy. How could it not? They knew that what they had come upon was more desirable than everything they owned and quickly gave it all up. The loss that these men experienced to possess the prize turned out to not be loss at all. In truth, they had exponentially gained. 

Jesus likens their response to the discovery that the kingdom of heaven is opened to sinners such as you and me. When the reality of what it means to be included in the kingdom is understood, all that might have to be left behind to be part of it shouldn’t feel like a sacrifice. Too often, however, we behave as though it were a tragedy, like being left with a couple of precious items as we watch our building burn to the ground. 

Why is it so difficult for some of us to receive the kingdom with joy? I suspect it’s because we don’t really grasp that damnation awaited us. The parable of the net, which immediately follows those alluded to above, teaches that at the end of this age there will be a judgment that only the “good” will survive. All who are “evil” will be sent away to an eternal existence too terrifying to imagine. 

The hard truth is that unless God acts none will be judged to be good on that day. But the gift of God is a Savior who was good, perfectly good, and our faith in his finished work opens the door to the kingdom. The apostle Paul understood this better than any other, as he was the “foremost” of sinners. This is why he wrote, “Through him we have . . . obtained access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and we rejoice in hope of the glory of God.” Like the men in the parables, he joyfully “suffered the loss of all things” and counted them “as rubbish, in order that [he might] gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of [his] own” but a righteousness that “comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith.” An exponential gain to be sure!